conics in euclidean and similarity geometries
We obtained standard forms of the equations for plane conics by choosing
particular lines as the x and yaxes. Observe that changing the axes can
be viewed as applying a euclidean transformation t to the axes, but leaving
the conic fixed, OR as applying t^{1} to the conic, but leaving the axes fixed.
Thus, our results on standard forms can be interpreted as a result about the
congruence classes of conics in euclidean geometry:
conics in euclidean geometry
Every plane conic is congruent in euclidean geometry to one of the following
 the parabola y^{2} = 4ax, with a > 0,
 the ellipse x^{2}/a^{2} + y^{2}/b^{2} = 1, with a > b > 0,
 the hyperbola x^{2}/a^{2}  y^{2}/b^{2} = 1, with a, b > 0,
Note. The list does not include the circle.
Examination on the results on standard forms shows that the values of the
eccentricity e and the focusdirectrix distance f can be recovered from those
of a and, when relevant, b. Any euclidean transformation preserves lengths,
so euclidean congruent conics have the same values of e and f. On the other
hand, since e and f determine a and b, two plane conics with the same e and f
with be congruent to the same standard conic, and hence to one another.
Theorem
Two plane conics are congruent in euclidean geometry if and only if they
have the same eccentricity and focusdirectrix distance.
In similarity geometry, the eccentricity is still invariant, since it is defined as
a ratio of lengths. Thus conics congruent in similarity geometry will have the
same value of e, but we may scale the figure to make f equal to any value
we wish. Thus, we have the
Theorem
Two plane conics are congruent in similarity geometry if and only if they
have the same eccentricity.
Note that the classes in similarity geoemtry are fewer in number, but that
each class is larger.

