The Proof of the Converse of Pascal's Theorem

Pascal's Theorem
Suppose that no three of the points A,B,C,D,E, are collinear.
If the point F lies on the conic determined by A,B,C,D and E,
then X = ACnDB, Y = CFnBE, Z = FDnEA are collinear.

The Converse
Suppose that no three of the points A,B,C,D,E, are collinear.
If X = ACnDB, Y = CFnBE, Z = FDnEA are collinear,
then the point F lies on the conic determined by A,B,C,D and E.

Proof of the Converse

Let C be the conic through A,B,C,D,E.

Suppose that CF = CY meets C at G, so CF = CG.
We show that F = G, so F is on C.
Now apply Pascal's Theorem to A,B,C,D,E,G to get These are all on the conic C.
X = ACnDB, Y = CGnBE, W = GDnEA collinear, CGnBE = Y as CG = CF
so that XY meets EA in W.
By hypothesis, X, Y and Z = FDnEA are collinear,
so that XY meets EA in Z.
Hence W = Z. XY, EA meet only once
Now CY meets DZ in F, Definition of Z
and CY meets DW in G. Definition of W
W = Z, so DW = DZ and hence F = G.
Note
The diagram is a little puzzling. It purports to show a case with F not on C.
But then the diagram indicates that X,Y and Z cannot be collinear, as X,Y,W are.
As the proof shows, the only way to resolve this is to have W = Z, so that F = G.
Converse of Pascal Main Geometry Page