The Klein View of Geometry |
Klein defines a geometry as
Definitions
The study of the geometry defined by G consists of
is consistent. With the axiomatic approach, it is always possible that the axioms lead to a contradiction. In such a case, there can be no "model" for the geometry. As an example, euclidean geometry may be described as having
geometrical property of euclidean geometry. We can use the group to prove that each of Euclid's axioms is a theorem of this geometry. The other advantage of Klein's approach is that it allows us to relate different geometries.
Suppose that G is a group of transformations of the set S, and that H is a subgroup of G.
|
|
Theorem K1 Suppose that G is a group of transformations of a set S, and H is a subgroup of G. If two figures are h-congruent, then they are g-congruent.
|
|
Proof Suppose that P and Q are h-congruent. Then there is an h in H with h(P) = Q. As H is a subgroup of G, hεG so P and Q are g-congruent.
It follows that each g-congruence class is a union of h-congruenced classes, so that,
Example
Suppose that tεE(2). As t preserves distance, t(C) will be the circle
Now suppose that sεS(2). Since scaling maps circles to circles, we see that
Note that the similarity class of C contains the euclidean class of C.
|
|
Theorem K2 Suppose that G is a group of transformations of a set S, and H is a subgroup of G. If D is a g-property, then it is an h-property.
|
|
Proof Suppose that D is a g-property, so is invariant under g for all g in G. For h in H, hεG as H≤G, so that D is invariant under h. Thus, the geometry defined by G may have fewer properties.
Example
|
|